What I Talk About When I Talk About Murakami
i recently signed up for the Murakami Reading Challenge, which involves reading any number of books written by Murakami over the span of 2011. i’ve more or less targeted 5 books, which means at least 5 of the 30 books i intend to complete by year end will be written by perhaps one of my most favorite authors of all time, Haruki Murakami. my Murakami books were all in Manila, so i took about a week off reading while waiting either for the Norwegian Wood i ordered from The Book Depository to arrive or for me to fly out to Manila (the latter preceded the former) . before joining mum in USTH, i managed to pick up Murakami’s “What I Talk About When I Talk About Running” on the way out of the house. i’m typing up my reflections on the book fresh after i finished my re-read.
*
What I Talk About When I Talk About Murakami
I think I’ve been reading Murakami’s work for more than a full decade now. People used to ask me what I liked about Murakami (yes, there was a time when the people around me were unfamiliar, and even reluctant, to read Murakami): I’d always say that I liked his works because it always sounded like the voice inside my head.
A decade on, this remains to be the primary reason that I have devoted years to reading, collecting, and proselytizing people to his works.
See, the voice in my head normally sounds as though every thought is being constantly written down onto paper (this, of course, happens when the voice in my head is slow enough). When my thoughts aren’t racing, the voice in my head is very much like the Boku’s in Murakami’s books, mulling over the meaning of ordinary things, reflecting on random memories, and sentimentalizing the rhythms of the life I choose to live.
There were times when I found myself relating to his characters more than I wanted to; although, I appreciate to no end the literary quiet he managed to bring to the act of cooking pasta, listening to the water slowly boil while a jazz record played in the background. Really, it felt like the scenes of my life literally being written on the pages of a book I’m reading.
I find it oddly consoling to admit that there’s a degree of vanity associated to my liking of Murakami. I’d like to think instead that we are kindred souls.
Reading Murakami’s memoir on running affirmed how richly I could relate to Murakami and the voice with which he writes with that manages to comes off his works. For a while in university, I ran a lot, and a lot of his reflections in running mirrored a lot of my sentiments about it. I never ran to the extent where I developed the physical requisites for distance running like he did; however, when I picked up the book some months into being employed some 2 years ago, reading about his struggles into finding his distance-running form allowed me to come to terms with a lot of the struggles I faced as a returning runner. In truth, I don’t think I’d have considered running again had I not cross-checked my experience of pain with his.
Needless to say, I understand what he means when he says that many things in life are learned best when reinforced with pain.
Obviously, I appreciated this book for its running angle; I love running (although I am painfully inconsistent with it), and the fact that the work covered richly a wide array of thoughts related to running (or, more accurately, to the thoughts that permeate a runner) is one of the reasons that I love this piece of work. It came to me at a time that I was trying to run again, and because like Murakami, I dislike sharing very specifically the effort I try to put into keeping fit, finding a very intimate means to listen and in a way, converse with someone about the journey into running was (and has remained) valuable to me.
However, I also love this work because to me, it was a treatise on how a man lived his life and how he’s come to terms with the decisions he’s made. It’s almost like having someone come as they are and watch them understand the person they have become over the years.
I’ve come to appreciate the wealth of wisdom that comes with self-awareness, and the extent with which I’ve tried to remain self-aware has helped me more deliberately define the person I am right now. There’s a lot of pain, shame, pride, and forgiveness repeatedly involved in the process, and reading through Murakami’s work felt as though I was vicariously living a self-aware life longer than the years I’ve been thusfar blessed with.
More importantly, reading Murakami write with so much self-awareness about his life in relation to running made me realize that perhaps, the other important reason I’ve remained with Murakami for so long was because I learned navigating through my own mind into becoming more self-aware from reading Murakami’s Boku’s undergo the same journey. It’s almost as though the voice in my head just happened to sound a lot like Murakami’s stream-of-consciousness writing; and then as I became more self-aware, the voice that I was constantly occupied with in my reading was Murakami’s. These two near serendipitous conditions thus reinforced the similarity of the voice we send into our consciousness in hopes of an echo that we can decipher in its return.
However, it’s important to note at this junction that there are fundamental differences between myself and Murakami— while we both relish our times alone, and learned by way of our circumstances how to better relate with people, I like competition. It matters to me what I win and the journey I take to winning. I loved school and excelled in it; I was raised in an environment where success in everything that I dedicated my time to was a given.
Just the same, the moment a jazz record plays through my earphones, I smile and wish I were somewhere else tossing noodles slowly during the last minutes of cooking in boiling water (like Toru in Wind-up Bird Chronicle). Then, my mind speaks to me in lines from Murakami’s works, and I feel as though a part of me has come full-circle.
the end of 2010 saw a sudden increase in reading on my part, and for the new year, i don’t want to wait until the 4th quarter of it to make time for reading. that’s simply unacceptable. when it came to estimating how many books i was going to aim for the year, i drew from gut-feel instinct that i’ve grown to develop from my line of work.
my average number of books read in 4th quarter of 2010 was roughly 2.5 books per month (some months saw 3, others just one). so, applying the rounded down average over 12 months of reading, i guesstimated 24 books for the year, plus an extra one for good measure. 25 books! almost like 1 book for every year of my life (i’m turning 25 this year).
i’m beginning my joining the Murakami Challenge. essentially, it’s just people reading as many Murakami works as they can over the course of the year. there are reading levels, too—
Levels of participation:
Hajime - Read one book
Sheep Man - Read 3 books
Toru - Read 5 books
Nakata - Read 7 books
Sumire - Read 10+ books
Super-frog - Read everything Murakami has written!
and i really, really love Murakami and how he writes, so i’m very excited! i’m currently targeting Toru level because it seems less daunting than Super-frog. also, Toru is the name of the protagonist in my favorite The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle. for this challenge, i’ve considering the following works:
1) The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle
2) Hardboiled Wonderland and the End of the World
3) What I Talk About When I Talk About Running
4) Norwegian Wood/ Wild Sheep Chase
5) The Elephant Vanishes/ Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman
i’ve read three of the 5 books on the list, but given that there are ties in numbers 4 and 5, i might end up reading 7 books if i remain indecisive. certainly though, i want to read at least one collection of short stores, and re-read What I Talk About and Wind-Up Bird Chronicle.
i’m reader #415. this may be my favorite marathon ever.
“We tesser. Or you might say, we wrinkle.”
How do you begin to describe a piece of your childhood, a veritable part of your heart?
“She keeps thinking she can explain things in words,” Mrs Who said. “Qui plus sait, plus se tait. French, you know. The more a man knows, the less he talks.”
★ M
Introducing Arianne
This little post is by way of an introduction. As you will see, my book-reading is a more trivial pursuit than my co-writers. The most serious book I’ve read all year was The Story of Britain: From the Romans to the Present, a Narrative History by Rebecca Fraser. And I read a few Loretta Chases and Carla Kellys twice.
Original post here and more backstory here.
That 15 Something meme flickering around Facebook has its claws in me. Picking fifteen and only fifteen books or movies that you cannot live without is tough, certainly if you only have fifteen minutes to figure it out. I definitely don’t think the lists I came up with truly reflect my preferences. I had to leave out my favourite plays—Magic by Chesteron and Importance of Being Earnest by Wilde—and I missed out Fever Pitch by Nick Hornby. I was torn between the Eyre Affair and The Well of Lost Plots? Which, if any, of the Campion books would I leave in? Could I include all the Brontes in one item?
So, let’s say, to make me feel better, I shall put up a 15 Authors note instead. The perfect solution, yes? That would adequately cover all my favourite and/or life-changing novels, and I wouldn’t have to choose between The Grand Sophy and Faro’s Daughter. Of course, ranking authors would be death.
A List of Authors Whose Books I Would Die Without
- Jane Austen
- Diana Wynne Jones
- PG Wodehouse
- Terry Pratchett
- Jasper Fforde
- Edith Nesbit
- GK Chesterton
- Georgette Heyer
- Eva Ibbotson
- Roald Dahl
- Neil Gaiman
- Tom Holt
- Megan McCafferty
- Meg Cabot
- Margery Allingham
I got stuck on number 15. Which of the Golden Age of Crime novelists ought I put in? Agatha Christie because she really had the best compact mysteries? Dorothy Sayers because she came up with Lord Peter Wimsey and Gaudy Night? Or Margery Allingham because she took a trope and turned it (rather ibb and obb-like) into someone more human and slightly less pretentious? Then there’s Lady Amanda Fitton who trumps Harriet Vane always. So Allingham, it is.
A List of Books with No Authorial Repeats
- Pride & Prejudice by Jane Austen
- Fire & Hemlock by Diana Wynne Jones
- Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
- Sloppy Firsts by Meg Cabot
- Wintersmith by Terry Pratchett
- Fever Pitch by Nick Hornby
- To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis
- Matilda by Roald Dahl
- Leave it to Psmith by PG Wodehouse
- A Door into Summer by Robert Heinlein
- Coraline by Neil Gaiman
- The Egypt Game by Zilpha Keatley Snyder
- Gaudy Night by Dorothy Sayers
- The Father Brown Stories by GK Chesterton
- The Perilous Gard by Elizabeth Marie Pope
Like I said, lists are tough. If one were to rank favourite books according to author … madness.
i finished The Reluctant Fundamentalist* this week (on the 14th), and because it doesn’t happen too often, i’d like to share that i finished this book in one sitting.
The Reluctant Fundamentalist is actually a rather short work of fiction about how the life of a Pakistani graduate of Princeton was changed following the events that we now remember grimly as 9/11.
i didn’t particularly like the writing style, being written in the first-person point of view, with the main character speaking to a rather quiet persona (the “you” in this instance) as they encounter each other in a tea shop in Pakistan. however, what i did like about this book was how the plot actually spoke about an internal conflict of identity, of purpose, of home, rather than the evidently popular tales of racial profiling, of fundamentalism even, and of the impending conflict that we, in retrospect, now face.
instead, it is about how 9/11 kindled within the heart of this young Pakistani a struggle to determine whether he belongs in the life he cultivated for himself in New York (as New Yorkers began to shed their identity as New Yorkers and instead identify themselves now as Americans), or if he belongs in the cultural context of his racial history.
Currently reading:
i had about two days off the reading mill before i started Colum McCann’s The Dancer. i just recently discovered McCann after i picked up Let the Great World Spin, and since then, i’ve been a huge fan of his literary ability to communicate emotional weight with studied brevity. i’m not even halfway through the book, but i’d have to say it’s promising.
♥, t.
—————————————————————————————————-
*The Reluctant Fundamentalist is an international bestseller written by Mohsin Hamid. This work has been included in reading programs for freshmen and undergraduates in various American universities, including University of St. Andrews, Washington University in St. Louis, and Georgetown University. Hamid’s first novel is called “Moth Smoke”.
**Photograph of the reviewed work is taken from my blog, sunshine spilling over, recounting the acquisitions last December 15. to read more, click here.